Return-path: Received: from mail-gg0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174]:60514 "EHLO mail-gg0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757832Ab2FHThr (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:37:47 -0400 Received: by gglu4 with SMTP id u4so1552566ggl.19 for ; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:37:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FD25487.7050002@lwfinger.net> (sfid-20120608_213757_197930_88BDC2EA) Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 14:37:43 -0500 From: Larry Finger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGFlbCBCw7xzY2g=?= CC: Johannes Berg , Andre Heider , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues)) References: <1339168452.5748.0.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1339168600.5748.2.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <4FD21C6B.5000402@lwfinger.net> <1339170182.5748.7.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1339170287.5748.8.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1339170510.5748.9.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1339170742.5748.10.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1339171159.5748.11.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <4FD22727.7000500@lwfinger.net> <1339172904.5748.18.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <20120608183339.78a7fcbd@milhouse> <4FD239AA.9090708@lwfinger.net> <20120608201053.48548a11@milhouse> <4FD24332.3010202@lwfinger.net> <20120608203131.01dce8e3@milhouse> In-Reply-To: <20120608203131.01dce8e3@milhouse> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/08/2012 01:31 PM, Michael Büsch wrote: > On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 13:23:46 -0500 > Larry Finger wrote: > >> On 06/08/2012 01:10 PM, Michael Büsch wrote: >>> On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:43:06 -0500 >>> Larry Finger wrote: >>> >>>> On 06/08/2012 11:33 AM, Michael Büsch wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Larry, did you check with PIO? >>>> >>>> No, I only used DMA. With the latest patch, compilation is Ok, and DMA works for >>>> both kinds of firmware, while PIO fails for both. >>> >>> Does PIO even work without that patch and with prop-firmware? >> >> No. That seems to be a different bug. > > That's nice. Could you probably bisect it? It used to work at some point. > > PS: > I'm sorry that I'm not of much help these days, because I currently > don't have a working b43 device around :) No problem. Most of the time when I'm running b43, it is on one of my older test machines. I need to do a little more testing before I start a bisection of the PIO problem. My PPC Mac fails with kernel 2.6.32, which is as old as I have available. At the moment, I don't have the time to fire up an old i586 notebook to see if we have a PIO problem, or an endian issue with PIO; however, I think Andre's wii is big endian. Larry