Return-path: Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:37245 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932383Ab2F1Ihz (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jun 2012 04:37:55 -0400 Received: by dady13 with SMTP id y13so2568281dad.19 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:37:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1340871433.4491.20.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> References: <1340821557-27009-1-git-send-email-arik@wizery.com> <1340871433.4491.20.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> From: Arik Nemtsov Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:37:38 +0300 Message-ID: (sfid-20120628_103800_689018_D30770F9) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: allow Rx in reconfig only after removing BA sessions To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 21:25 +0300, Arik Nemtsov wrote: >> Previously, a connected STA/AP could send us some AMPDUs right after >> recovery, without the driver knowing anything about it. > > Huh, that description doesn't make a lot of sense? The STA/AP can send > us AMPDUs anyway without the driver knowing anything about it since it > has no idea we're restarting ... Well the point is to drop them early in the Rx path. Should I change the description or you don't like the patch in general?