Return-path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:61991 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932119Ab2FGSSP (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2012 14:18:15 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 11:18:12 -0700 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: Seth Forshee CC: Arend van Spriel , Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/8] brcm80211: smac: inform mac80211 of the X2 regulatory domain Message-ID: <20120607181812.GD4603@tux> (sfid-20120607_201819_064185_48FA1AD9) References: <1334607462-5387-1-git-send-email-seth.forshee@canonical.com> <1334607462-5387-5-git-send-email-seth.forshee@canonical.com> <4FC008AB.4080107@broadcom.com> <20120526171800.GC11759@ubuntu-mba> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <20120526171800.GC11759@ubuntu-mba> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 12:18:00PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote: > My understanding of DFS is pretty rudamentary. Could you explain what > support is needed? I do see that mac80211 doesn't really support power > measurement requests, but if we can at least stop transmission when > radar is present couldn't we still operate on the channels? > > Luis, any insight you can offer on the subject would be appreciated. You can forget about DFS master support at this point. DFS client mode is handled by mac80211 though. Luis