Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:36409 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752235Ab2GPK3E (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2012 06:29:04 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 03:29:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20120716.032901.1657058688119342783.davem@davemloft.net> (sfid-20120716_122945_730543_1A986DC5) To: balbi@ti.com Cc: joe@perches.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, wimax@linuxwimax.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net, uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] etherdevice: Rename random_ether_addr to eth_random_addr From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20120716101437.GC22638@arwen.pp.htv.fi> References: <1341968967.13724.23.camel@joe2Laptop> <20120716101437.GC22638@arwen.pp.htv.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Felipe Balbi Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:14:38 +0300 > if you're really renaming the function, then this patch alone will break > all of the below users. That should all be a single patch, I'm afraid. It would help if you actually read his patches before saying what they might or might not do. He provides a macro in the first patch that provides the old name, and this will get removed at the end.