Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:51680 "EHLO mail-we0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932314Ab2GDAai (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2012 20:30:38 -0400 Received: by werb14 with SMTP id b14so3897377wer.19 for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 17:30:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FF38EA9.8000709@gmail.com> (sfid-20120704_023056_270186_C64C0D5A) Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 02:30:33 +0200 From: Xose Vazquez Perez MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org, linville@tuxdriver.com Subject: Re: [wireless-regdb] [PATCH] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for ES (Spain) on 5GHz and 2.4GHz References: <1341350730-11037-1-git-send-email-xose.vazquez@gmail.com> <4FF38492.20003@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/04/2012 01:59 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Please send a new patch and if you are going to convert something form > dBm to mW then please do that in *one* single patch so that it can > easily be read what changes you are *actually* making. That is one > patch to make a conversion in units that will not make any actual > changes, and then send another patch with all the verbiage you can use > to explain *why* you want the change you are making. You want the > commit log to have enough language so that if I forward the patch to a > regulatory person who has never read a patch they can read it. There was only one patch. The second mail was only a "Signed-off-by:", just in case. > The agreed upon "bar" for quality of regulatory patches was agreed > upon a while ago, for details see: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=128414096127554&w=2 Thank youuuuu http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/Regulatory#Mailing_list_for_regulatory_updates :-P > The more information you can provide the better. I believe I sent enough. -thanks-