Return-path: Received: from mail-yw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]:44139 "EHLO mail-yw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755379Ab2GLQXY (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2012 12:23:24 -0400 Received: by yhmm54 with SMTP id m54so2890027yhm.19 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:23:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FFEF9F8.5060106@lwfinger.net> (sfid-20120712_182328_628958_B8618D93) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:23:20 -0500 From: Larry Finger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Forest Bond CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Anyone using rtl8192de with 2.4GHz 802.11g? References: <20120712002149.GA14850@alittletooquiet.net> <4FFE211C.3020506@lwfinger.net> <20120712013216.GB14850@alittletooquiet.net> <4FFE2F38.7030604@lwfinger.net> <20120712152545.GA9489@alittletooquiet.net> In-Reply-To: <20120712152545.GA9489@alittletooquiet.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/12/2012 10:25 AM, Forest Bond wrote: > Hi Larry, > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 08:58:16PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote: >> On 07/11/2012 08:32 PM, Forest Bond wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 07:58:04PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote: >>>> On 07/11/2012 07:21 PM, Forest Bond wrote: >>>>> The rtl8192de driver is working fine for me at 5GHz, but I am having trouble >>>>> getting scan results for 2.4GHz 802.11g networks. I have been doing a lot of >>>>> debugging but am not making much progress. I suspect the 802.11 b/g/n phy is >>>>> not being initialized correctly, but I'm pretty far outside my domain on this >>>>> one. >>>>> >>>>> Is anyone successfully using this driver with a 2.4GHz 802.11g network? >>>> >>>> I have several different models - some work better than others. What >>>> is the PCI ID for yours? >>> >>> This is the one I have: >>> >>> 02:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Device [10ec:8193] >>> 02:00.1 Network controller [0280]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Device [10ec:8193] (rev 01) >> >> It turns out that both kinds have the same ID. I think one of them >> is a prototype, while the other is probably a production unit. >> Obviously, bitrot has set in while I wasn't testing. With the kernel >> driver, neither unit can even scan in the 2.4 GHz band. Using the >> latest version of the vendor driver, the production version connects >> with APs running WEP, WPA, or WPA2. The prototype can only handle >> WEP. >> >> Obviously, I have some work to do. In the meantime, I will send you >> a tarball containing the vendor driver - privately so as not to spam >> the list. > > Thank you, I appreciate that. > > Of course, my preference would be to fix up the kernel driver. I don't mind > doing some manual bisection with compat-wireless releases unless you think that > would be a total waste of time. Do you have any sense for what the last working > kernel version would have been? > > As you suggest, we may need to use the vendor driver in the meantime. Thanks > again for sending it over (although I suspect it is the same version I > downloaded from Realtek's web site). It started with the Realtek version, but has some important bug fixes that I wanted you to have. Of course, we want to fix the kernel version, but if you want to bisect compat-wireless, that would be a big help. In the meantime, I will try bisecting wireless-testing when I get a chance. Larry