Return-path: Received: from mail-yw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]:45396 "EHLO mail-yw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932152Ab2GDQ0j (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2012 12:26:39 -0400 Received: by yhmm54 with SMTP id m54so7405992yhm.19 for ; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 09:26:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1341394944.4482.9.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> References: <1341357315-8053-1-git-send-email-rodrigue@qca.qualcomm.com> <1341357315-8053-5-git-send-email-rodrigue@qca.qualcomm.com> <1341394944.4482.9.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 09:26:18 -0700 Message-ID: (sfid-20120704_182643_661391_2901327E) Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] cfg80211: add cellular base station regulatory hint support To: Johannes Berg Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com, arend@broadcom.com, henry@logout.com, senthilb@qca.qualcomm.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I've skipped the other comments as I can address those in a new series. On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 2:42 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > So I'm not really convinced about this. It seems this Kconfig should > better be a Kconfig that enables other Kconfig only, not enabling other > features. How else would anyone be able to do due diligence and check > what exactly this enables that they need to test? Makes sense, so would we then have CONFIG_REG_HINT_CELL_BASE_STATION ? Luis