Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:33450 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933512Ab2GCX7b convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2012 19:59:31 -0400 Received: by pbbrp8 with SMTP id rp8so10047041pbb.19 for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 16:59:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4FF38492.20003@gmail.com> References: <1341350730-11037-1-git-send-email-xose.vazquez@gmail.com> <4FF38492.20003@gmail.com> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 16:59:11 -0700 Message-ID: (sfid-20120704_015935_842525_465AA55D) Subject: Re: [wireless-regdb] [PATCH] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for ES (Spain) on 5GHz and 2.4GHz To: Xose Vazquez Perez Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org, linville@tuxdriver.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > On 07/03/2012 11:25 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: >> >> Spanish law was based on CEPT/EU rules: >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-June/000058.html >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-June/000059.html >> >> >> Orden ITC/332/2010, de 12 de febrero, por la que se aprueba el cuadro >> nacional de atribución de frecuencias (CNAF): >> https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2010-2719 >> https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2010/02/19/pdfs/BOE-A-2010-2719.pdf >> >> search for: >> UN - 85 RLANs y datos en 2400 a 2483,5 MHz (pag. 213) >> UN – 128 RLANs en 5 GHz (pag. 232) >> >> more info at "Cuadro nacional de atribución de frecuencias (CNAF)": >> http://www.minetur.gob.es/telecomunicaciones/espectro/paginas/cnaf.aspx >> >> --- >> db.txt | 8 ++++---- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt >> index 4c54543..11409d6 100644 >> --- a/db.txt >> +++ b/db.txt >> @@ -239,10 +239,10 @@ country EG: >> (5250 - 5330 @ 20), (N/A, 20), DFS >> >> country ES: DFS-ETSI >> - (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (N/A, 20) >> - (5170 - 5250 @ 40), (N/A, 20) >> - (5250 - 5330 @ 40), (N/A, 20), DFS >> - (5490 - 5710 @ 40), (N/A, 27), DFS >> + (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW) >> + (5150 - 5250 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR >> + (5250 - 5350 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS >> + (5470 - 5725 @ 40), (N/A, 500 mW), DFS >> >> country FI: DFS-ETSI >> (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (N/A, 20) >> > > Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez Please send a new patch and if you are going to convert something form dBm to mW then please do that in *one* single patch so that it can easily be read what changes you are *actually* making. That is one patch to make a conversion in units that will not make any actual changes, and then send another patch with all the verbiage you can use to explain *why* you want the change you are making. You want the commit log to have enough language so that if I forward the patch to a regulatory person who has never read a patch they can read it. The agreed upon "bar" for quality of regulatory patches was agreed upon a while ago, for details see: http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=128414096127554&w=2 The more information you can provide the better. Luis