Return-path: Received: from storm.alittletooquiet.net ([67.23.28.199]:33478 "EHLO storm.alittletooquiet.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932528Ab2GLPZq (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:25:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:25:46 -0400 From: Forest Bond To: Larry Finger Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Anyone using rtl8192de with 2.4GHz 802.11g? Message-ID: <20120712152545.GA9489@alittletooquiet.net> (sfid-20120712_172551_324741_8C061AB8) References: <20120712002149.GA14850@alittletooquiet.net> <4FFE211C.3020506@lwfinger.net> <20120712013216.GB14850@alittletooquiet.net> <4FFE2F38.7030604@lwfinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL" In-Reply-To: <4FFE2F38.7030604@lwfinger.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Larry, On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 08:58:16PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote: > On 07/11/2012 08:32 PM, Forest Bond wrote: > >On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 07:58:04PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote: > >>On 07/11/2012 07:21 PM, Forest Bond wrote: > >>>The rtl8192de driver is working fine for me at 5GHz, but I am having t= rouble > >>>getting scan results for 2.4GHz 802.11g networks. I have been doing a= lot of > >>>debugging but am not making much progress. I suspect the 802.11 b/g/n= phy is > >>>not being initialized correctly, but I'm pretty far outside my domain = on this > >>>one. > >>> > >>>Is anyone successfully using this driver with a 2.4GHz 802.11g network? > >> > >>I have several different models - some work better than others. What > >>is the PCI ID for yours? > > > >This is the one I have: > > > >02:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Devic= e [10ec:8193] > >02:00.1 Network controller [0280]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Devic= e [10ec:8193] (rev 01) >=20 > It turns out that both kinds have the same ID. I think one of them > is a prototype, while the other is probably a production unit. > Obviously, bitrot has set in while I wasn't testing. With the kernel > driver, neither unit can even scan in the 2.4 GHz band. Using the > latest version of the vendor driver, the production version connects > with APs running WEP, WPA, or WPA2. The prototype can only handle > WEP. >=20 > Obviously, I have some work to do. In the meantime, I will send you > a tarball containing the vendor driver - privately so as not to spam > the list. Thank you, I appreciate that. Of course, my preference would be to fix up the kernel driver. I don't mind doing some manual bisection with compat-wireless releases unless you think = that would be a total waste of time. Do you have any sense for what the last wo= rking kernel version would have been? As you suggest, we may need to use the vendor driver in the meantime. Than= ks again for sending it over (although I suspect it is the same version I downloaded from Realtek's web site). Thanks, Forest --=20 Forest Bond http://www.alittletooquiet.net http://www.rapidrollout.com --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk/+7HkACgkQRO4fQQdv5AyYPwCfZUpLPnkfe8XhcqeZNRbuU/Bt 8TUAoM8rUf7ab3yvgh41dEldL8Nwxl+h =zTIM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL--