Return-path: Received: from hetz2.bluebottle.com ([176.9.57.138]:58969 "EHLO fe0.bluebottle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758758Ab2HXRNO (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:13:14 -0400 To: Larry Finger Cc: Hauke Mehrtens , Bastian Bittorf , openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, feint@lists.subsignal.org, =?iso-8859-1?b?UmFmYcWCIA==?= =?iso-8859-1?b?TWnFgmVja2k=?= , b43-dev Message-ID: <1345828391.5037b627637de@mail.bluebottle.com> (sfid-20120824_191320_544637_3A7318D2) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:13:11 +0100 From: Bastian Bittorf Subject: Re: WRT54g / b43 / mac802.11 BREAKTHROUGH References: <1342612598.5006a476022c6@mail.bluebottle.com> <50350706.609@hauke-m.de> <503528BD.2020302@lwfinger.net> In-Reply-To: <503528BD.2020302@lwfinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Do you have any info whether the failure occurs with the change > from OFDM to > CCK, or vice versa? I am wondering if the radio needs a dummy i cannot answer this question - interesting idea. i like to test your patch, simply do a dummy tx in both cases. bye, bastian