Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:36389 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754555Ab2HTL5e (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Aug 2012 07:57:34 -0400 Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1T3Qbt-0005ZO-48 for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:57:33 +0200 Message-ID: <1345463850.4459.20.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20120820_135738_267955_2EA80469) Subject: Re: [RFC 0/8] channel switch improvements From: Johannes Berg To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:57:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1343834487-23737-1-git-send-email-johannes@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20120801_172135_485039_3F6BF73C) References: <1343834487-23737-1-git-send-email-johannes@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20120801_172135_485039_3F6BF73C) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 17:21 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > mac80211 currently doesn't support extended channel switch > and also doesn't handle failures well. > > Support extended channel switch when the operating class > is one of the global operating classes, and handle any > failures by disconnecting from the network. > > This is completely untested so far, does anyone have a > good test environment for this kind of thing? Since they're just cleanups, I applied the first five patches. The rest need to be tested and validated more etc. johannes