Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:60480 "EHLO ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752165Ab2H1S7u (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:59:50 -0400 Message-ID: <503D14FF.5000309@candelatech.com> (sfid-20120828_205954_697247_89B5F357) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 11:59:11 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Does ath9k support beam forming? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I saw some RFC patches about beam-forming from 2010, but grepping current code doesn't find anything that indicates these patches ever made it upstream. Of course, I could be looking for the wrong thing... Does the current ath9k code support beam-forming? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com