Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:7387 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756667Ab2HZCB7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Aug 2012 22:01:59 -0400 From: Sujith Manoharan MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: <20537.33465.256314.716102@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (sfid-20120826_040242_537925_EFE99F19) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 07:28:17 +0530 To: Sherwin Soltani CC: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: ath9k: AR9462 btcoex doesn't appear to work In-Reply-To: <50394BE4.3000508@wybc.com> References: <50394BE4.3000508@wybc.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Sherwin Soltani wrote: > I have an Acer Aspire V5-571 which contains the AR9462 chipset (PCI ID > 168c:0034), supported by the ath9k driver. This chipset claims to > support Bluetooth coexistence. However, after booting up, my kernel does > not register any Bluetooth devices. > > I am using kernel version 3.6.0-999-generic (apw@gomeisa) (gcc version > 4.6.3 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5)). I also tried 3.4 and 3.2 kernels > without success. Additionally, I can try to do > > rmmod ath9k && modprobe ath9k btcoex_enable=1 > > In the message log, I can see this: > > [ 1204.643120] ath9k: ath9k: Driver unloaded > [ 1214.203099] ath: phy1: Disabling ASPM since BTCOEX is enabled > [ 1214.203105] ath: EEPROM regdomain: 0x6a > [ 1214.203106] ath: EEPROM indicates we should expect a direct regpair map > [ 1214.203108] ath: Country alpha2 being used: 00 > [ 1214.203109] ath: Regpair used: 0x6a > > However 'hcitool dev' shows no devices after this operation. What does lsusb -v show ? The correct firmware is required, you can find it in: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/dwmw2/linux-firmware.git;a=summary Copy the files in ar3k/ into /lib/firmware/ar3k (might be different depending on your distro). Reload ath3k and something like this should be seen: root@linux-test ~# hciconfig hci1 up root@linux-test ~# hcitool dev Devices: hci1 00:03:7F:44:84:8A > Looking back through the ath9k-devel list, I can see that there was some > discussion on this chipset, but it seems that Bluetooth functionality > wasn't tested with it. Is this a known problem? Is there any information > I can supply to help fix it? Coexistence testing is ongoing and bugs are still being ironed out, but basic support is mostly done. > Aside from the Bluetooth problems, there are also problems with > frequently dropping signals (even when I am very close to the access > point), but right now that's a secondary concern to Bluetooth for me. Can you try with the latest driver (using compat-wireless) and see if the problem persists ? If it does, please post the kernel log with driver debugging set to 0x8f49. http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k/debug Sujith