Return-path: Received: from contumacia.investici.org ([178.255.144.35]:27662 "EHLO contumacia.investici.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751439Ab2HHV7I (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Aug 2012 17:59:08 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 23:58:59 +0200 From: Antonio Quartulli To: Sujith Manoharan Cc: =?utf-8?B?Tmljb2zDoXMgRWNow6FuaXo=?= , Guido Iribarren , ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc 1mbps in IBSS mode Message-ID: <20120808215858.GB6767@ritirata.org> (sfid-20120808_235913_168769_BFA902C7) References: <4FD56DCA.1080200@codigosur.org> <20474.20627.928963.262924@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <4FFF2B15.5070502@codigosur.org> <20482.22437.126251.847921@gargle.gargle.HOWL> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qcHopEYAB45HaUaB" In-Reply-To: <20482.22437.126251.847921@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --qcHopEYAB45HaUaB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 11:09:49AM +0530, Sujith Manoharan wrote: > Nicol=C3=A1s Ech=C3=A1niz wrote: > > Sujith, does this mean that the problem is outside the scope of the > > ath9k_htc driver itself or could it be fixed? > >=20 > > we are doing some heavy use of hardware based on this driver for many > > projects; any further debugging work you might need, we are more than > > willing to help. >=20 > This is a regression introduced by this commit: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=3Dlinux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=3Dcommit= ;h=3D6d810f10325522cfcf498dc6d64b9f96e1f5153f >=20 > Fixing this requires either introducing a new mac80211 callback or > revert to the older behavior which issued a station notification only > after the supported rates have been setup. >=20 Hello everybody, sorry for the very late response on this topic. I am performing some tests now using mac80211_hwsim. I'm first letting wlan0 join the ibss and then I let wlan1 join the same ib= ss. In the log I clearly read that the basic rates get updated by means of a beacon/probe response (actually this is what I expected). Then I tried to send frames from wlan0 to wlan1 passing through the emulated link and I can see with "iw dev wlan0 station dump" that the tx rate gets h= igher and higher up to 54mbps. Therefore I do not see any problem with the update= of the basic rates. Am I missing/overlooking something? @Sujith, do you have a more clear idea of what the problem is? Cheers, --=20 Antonio Quartulli =2E.each of us alone is worth nothing.. Ernesto "Che" Guevara --qcHopEYAB45HaUaB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlAi4SIACgkQpGgxIkP9cwdqSACfdO4l8tNAb2a+h1bJyWFNXXXb UHkAn1SzhtJ4CpuSa7EsKNTSF4LVfoEe =o052 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qcHopEYAB45HaUaB--