Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:25546 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751702Ab2HMHf0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Aug 2012 03:35:26 -0400 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 09:34:46 +0200 From: Stanislaw Gruszka To: "Goldenshtein, Victor" Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, kgiori@qca.qualcomm.com, mcgrof@frijolero.org, zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com, adrian.chadd@gmail.com, j@w1.fi, johannes@sipsolutions.net, coelho@ti.com, assaf@ti.com, yoni.divinsky@ti.com, igalc@ti.com, adrian@freebsd.org, nbd@nbd.name, simon.wunderlich@s2003.tu-chemnitz.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] mac80211: add ap channel switch command/event Message-ID: <20120813073444.GA2272@redhat.com> (sfid-20120813_093529_824992_F71009D8) References: <1344426823-1795-1-git-send-email-victorg@ti.com> <1344426823-1795-7-git-send-email-victorg@ti.com> <20120810163635.GC17559@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:31:29AM +0300, Goldenshtein, Victor wrote: > > Why we can not use ->channel_switch calback for this purpose (merge > > ieee80211_channel_switch and ieee80211_ap_ch_switch)? > > > > Well at first (see previous threads) it was a single channel switch > for both AP/STA, but later after community reviews it was decided to > split these two. Ah, ok. Although I do not see the point of creating almost two identical structures and two identical callbacks, this is up to Johannes. Stanislaw