Return-path: Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:65234 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753308Ab2HPTer (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:34:47 -0400 Received: by bkwj10 with SMTP id j10so1050559bkw.19 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:34:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Christian Lamparter To: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: carl9170: Unintentional transmission in monitor mode? Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:34:31 +0200 Cc: Marco Fonseca , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "Chen, Stephen" References: <20120809165434.GA13409@192.168.1.10> <201208092143.28506.chunkeey@googlemail.com> <1345144855.4665.3.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> In-Reply-To: <1345144855.4665.3.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <201208162134.32152.chunkeey@googlemail.com> (sfid-20120816_213452_050595_D42C7EAF) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thursday, August 16, 2012 09:20:55 PM Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 21:43 +0200, Christian Lamparter wrote: > > On Thursday, August 09, 2012 06:54:34 PM Marco Fonseca wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > > > I've noticed unexpected transmissions from the AR9170 while in monitor mode > > > and using tcpdump (and sometimes without tcpdump running). These > > > transmissions degrade (pretty significantly) performance of other STA/AP on > > > the channel (as seen by iperf going from 60mbit/s to almost nill). As best I > > > can tell these transmissions never coalesces into an actual frame in the air > > > (at least not one I'm able to pick up with a second different adapter in > > > monitor mode). > > > > > > Are there any known reasons/bugs on this? Is there anyway to completely > > > silence the transmitter of the AR9170 while still allowing reception? > > > > > yes. > > > > a solution is described in: > > > > > > (iw dev wlanX set monitor none - if I'm not mistaken) > > I've seen this before too -- what flag causes the issue, and why? Well that would be: FIF_OTHER_BSS or FIF_PROMISC_IN_BSS either one of these will set following flags for the hardware: AR9170_MAC_RX_CTRL_ACK_IN_SNIFFER AR9170_MAC_SNIFFER_ENABLE_PROMISC About the issue, I'm really can't tell w/o schematics of the hardware. It could be that ACK_IN_SNIFFER is more of a debug/test flag than a real feature? (Anyway, I cc'd Stephen. Maybe he knows more) Regards, Chr