Return-path: Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:63529 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754347Ab2IJSwI (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:52:08 -0400 Received: by eaac11 with SMTP id c11so1075371eaa.19 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:52:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Christian Lamparter To: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3.6] p54: fix off-by-one null pointer bug in p54_tx_80211 Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 20:51:57 +0200 Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <201209080128.43388.chunkeey@googlemail.com> <20120910184159.GC2137@tuxdriver.com> In-Reply-To: <20120910184159.GC2137@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <201209102051.57928.chunkeey@googlemail.com> (sfid-20120910_205212_382226_9ED8609B) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Monday 10 September 2012 20:42:00 John W. Linville wrote: > This doesn't seem to apply on top of 3.6. Is it OK to keep it > for -next? Or do you want to do a 3.6 version? > Oh, isn't "move TX station pointer and restructure TX" in 3.6? Oh well, -next is ok in this case then :D. Regards, Chr