Return-path: Received: from mail-ie0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174]:55171 "EHLO mail-ie0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750897Ab2IEFJk (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2012 01:09:40 -0400 Received: by ieje11 with SMTP id e11so279834iej.19 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 22:09:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5040D1F4.40709@candelatech.com> References: <503D14FF.5000309@candelatech.com> <503E2E66.8010909@candelatech.com> <5040D1F4.40709@candelatech.com> Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 10:39:39 +0530 Message-ID: (sfid-20120905_071029_148332_5A3378D5) Subject: Re: Does ath9k support beam forming? From: Mohammed Shafi To: Ben Greear Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Ben, > > > I'll soon have the ability to script throughput tests v/s various > attenuations (using programmable attenuator that I'm building). > > I can do over-the-air tests as well. Probably 2-4 weeks until I > get everything automated, but when it is, I'll run some baseline > tests and then if you can post patches (RFC is fine if you are > not sure it's ready for upstream) then I can do some tests with > that as well and compare the results... currently working in some other feature bug fixing and my project responsibilities may change, not sure how much time i would (or) how soon i would do, but if i do work on this, i can sync up with the latest h/w code. > > > Thanks, > Ben > > > -- > Ben Greear > Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com > -- thanks, shafi