Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:47058 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753408Ab2IJSpP (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:45:15 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:33:35 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Arend van Spriel Cc: Linux Wireless List , Seth Forshee Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] brcmsmac: fix for regulatory rules and flush callback Message-ID: <20120910183335.GA2137@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20120910_204548_440095_A4BD960E) References: <1346838562-4818-1-git-send-email-arend@broadcom.com> <504DE996.4020709@broadcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <504DE996.4020709@broadcom.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 03:22:30PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 09/05/2012 11:49 AM, Arend van Spriel wrote: > >Two fixes intended for the wireless tree. The issue with the .flush() has > >been giving me a lot of email from RedHat's bugzilla server. Hope this > >patch will silence that ;-) > > Hi John, > > I should remove that smile above, but are you planning to take these > for v3.6. At least the first patch is a clear bug fix that I would > like > to have applied. > > Gr. AvS Arend, I held-off on these because of the continuing discussion... I definitely 'feel your pain' re: Red Hat bugzilla and the second patch. But I'm not sure it meets either the 'small' or 'obvious' tests, so I would prefer to leave it out for now. I'll take the first one now. Thanks, John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.