Return-path: Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:46530 "EHLO mail-ob0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754246Ab2IDBDH (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Sep 2012 21:03:07 -0400 Received: by obbuo13 with SMTP id uo13so10071095obb.19 for ; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:03:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1346146446-628-1-git-send-email-yeohchunyeow@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 09:03:07 +0800 Message-ID: (sfid-20120904_030312_171960_E268733B) Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath5k: add support of HW encryption in management frames From: Yeoh Chun-Yeow To: Adrian Chadd Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, jirislaby@gmail.com, mickflemm@gmail.com, mcgrof@qca.qualcomm.com, ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, Adrian I have tested with secured mesh on AR5213A, AR5413 and AR2413/AR2414. It seems work for me. > I suggest that you at least wrap this in a run-time configuration item > that defaults to off or something. Yes, I do agree on this. But if more peoples are able to test it and confirm, it would be better. Thanks Regards, Chun-Yeow On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 31 August 2012 08:24, Yeoh Chun-Yeow wrote: >> Hi, Adrian >> >> Appreciate your testing on this. >> > > Hi, > > I don't have time to test ath5k stuff. I'm just an Atheros employee > who hacks on FreeBSD in his spare time. I'm lurking to provide > feedback. :-) > > I suggest that you at least wrap this in a run-time configuration item > that defaults to off or something. i'd be really worried about this > stuff having subtle bugs that aren't well documented; it may work for > you but it may induce weird behaviour in other setups. > > > > Adrian