Return-path: Received: from segment-119-226.sify.net ([119.226.185.252]:58181 "EHLO gesmail.globaledgesoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753520Ab2I1LMO (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 07:12:14 -0400 Message-ID: <54902.192.168.200.1.1348830853.squirrel@gesmail.globaledgesoft.com> (sfid-20120928_131217_436732_A2B8B252) In-Reply-To: <87k3vg3e8r.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> References: <87k3vg3e8r.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:44:13 +0530 (IST) Subject: Re: Which tree to pull for submitting patches to net/mac80211 From: kirankumar.b@globaledgesoft.com To: "Kalle Valo" Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Thank you very much for your clarity : ) > kiranaab ki writes: > >> I also see in MAINTAINERS list that Johannes Berg maintains two trees >> mac80211.git, >> mac80211-next.git >> >> If I want to send the patches for net/mac80211 and net/cfg8011 >> do I need to pull wireless-testing.git and send the patches so that >> John W Linwille reviews them >> >> or >> >> do I need to pull mac80211-next.git and send the patches so that >> Johannes Berg will review the patches and later John W Linville >> pulls the changes from Johannes's tree along the development process ? > > For new people in the Linux development I would recommend to use > wireless-testing and submit patches to the linux-wireless mailing, just > to keep things simple. Johannes when picks up the patch whenever he has > time. > > In rare occasions your patch might conflict with something which is in > mac80211-next and Johannes might ask you to rebase your patch. But this > usually happens when making more extensive changes to mac80211, for > smaller patches this is really rare. > > -- > Kalle Valo >