Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:46400 "EHLO mail-we0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752303Ab2ITGGp convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2012 02:06:45 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1348053493-22955-1-git-send-email-jarl@softace.dk> <505A1206.4020606@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:06:44 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20120920_080659_918393_89E74791) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Added information about which firmware file is being requested. From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= To: Jarl Friis Cc: Michael Tokarev , Stefano Brivio , =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor_Stefanik?= , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2012/9/19 Jarl Friis : > 2012/9/19 Michael Tokarev : >> On 19.09.2012 15:18, Jarl Friis wrote: >> >>> + b43info(ctx->dev->wl, "Requesting firmware file '%s'\n", ctx->fwname); >>> err = request_firmware(&blob, ctx->fwname, ctx->dev->dev->dev); >> >> Hmm. I wonder if this should be printed in request_firmware() >> itself instead of in all callers? > > Now that you mention it, I also think that is a much better idea. > However that would be a much more central place to do the change, so I > would gladly see somebody else do that patch (in replacement of mine) I agree, please submit patch modifying request_firmware if you believe it's important. -- RafaƂ