Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:57052 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752417Ab2JXVWw (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:22:52 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id rr4so1496678pbb.19 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:22:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20121024194547.GA19060@shredder> References: <20121024194547.GA19060@shredder> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:22:51 -0700 Message-ID: (sfid-20121024_232256_554200_55DD4CBD) Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc and reported mactime From: Adrian Chadd To: Thomas Pedersen Cc: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, linux-wireless , Bob Copeland Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, can you please repeat this experiment but dump the TSF32/TSF64 fields there as hexadecimal, rather than decimal? I'd like to see if this is an example of "bad TSF32->TSF64 promotion". adrian