Return-path: Received: from mail-da0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:35535 "EHLO mail-da0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751079Ab2J1WG0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:06:26 -0400 Received: by mail-da0-f46.google.com with SMTP id n41so2110239dak.19 for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:06:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <508C259F.8010909@broadcom.com> References: <1351073603-11616-1-git-send-email-johannes@sipsolutions.net> <50880BD0.6080603@candelatech.com> <1351093332.10709.5.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <5DA0F03B-BA8C-4D9F-A9F1-0841D6774255@bluemesh.net> <50888021.4050300@candelatech.com> <508C259F.8010909@broadcom.com> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:06:26 -0700 Message-ID: (sfid-20121028_230630_087801_5F2BFBD8) Subject: Re: Is Multi-Vif (vaps) Different Channel Operation Supported? From: Adrian Chadd To: Arend van Spriel Cc: Ben Greear , Kelly Hogan , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 27 October 2012 11:19, Arend van Spriel wrote: > In my Intersil/Conexant days there was a marketing dude coming up with > 'time-slicing AP' and there was a way to signal STAs the AP was not able to > receive. Just needed to be back in time to send its beacon. I chose to > forget all about the bad idea. Yup that's what you'd have to do.. with all the timing / settling issues inherent in that. adrian