Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50707 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750733Ab2JHJQ7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2012 05:16:59 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 11:15:24 +0200 From: Stanislaw Gruszka To: Andreas Hartmann Cc: "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com Subject: Re: [rt2x00-users] [PATCH 1/7] rt2800: use BBP_R1 for setting tx power Message-ID: <20121008091523.GB2478@redhat.com> (sfid-20121008_111703_432490_9F610AD6) References: <1349437455-18754-1-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> <506F0A56.70900@01019freenet.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <506F0A56.70900@01019freenet.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 06:27:02PM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > I would like to test this patchset. Whereon should I pay (most) > attention? What do you expect to be changed (or not) behaviour with 2.4 > GHz / 40 MHz? Yes, all band 2.4GHz/5GHz and bandwitch 20MHz/40MHz combinations are touched by those patches. You can check if patches make anything better on long distance performance if you want to. Thanks Stanislaw