Return-path: Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:40219 "EHLO mail-ob0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751702Ab2JHPuj (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2012 11:50:39 -0400 Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id uo13so3665957obb.19 for ; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 08:50:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120929093118.GA3022@ritirata.org> References: <1348761132-8344-1-git-send-email-mohammed@qca.qualcomm.com> <20581.2614.43943.601901@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <50652E56.10303@qca.qualcomm.com> <20581.32544.134606.56158@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20120929093118.GA3022@ritirata.org> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 21:20:38 +0530 Message-ID: (sfid-20121008_175042_823367_EE16C8B7) Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] ath9k_htc: Advertize allowed vif combinations From: Mohammed Shafi To: Antonio Quartulli Cc: Sujith Manoharan , Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan , "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Rodriguez Luis , ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Antonio Quartulli wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 04:12:40 +0530, Sujith Manoharan wrote: >> Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote: >> > oh yeah, you are saying that we will have some issues with IBSS >> > coexistence with other modes because of TSF sync. >> >> Yes, this is a problem. > > Is there anyway to overcome this problem? Can we bind the single TSF to multiple > virtualTSF? or must the device somehow support us? Antonio, agained i checked with the ath9k_htc maintainer, he said the IBSS coexistence is not possible. So i would go with my current patch. Please do feel free to enhance. Currently i am working in some other project, not sure i would be able to take this up. > > Cheers, > > > -- > Antonio Quartulli > > ..each of us alone is worth nothing.. > Ernesto "Che" Guevara -- thanks, shafi