Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:41884 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756666Ab2JWHU4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2012 03:20:56 -0400 Message-ID: <1350976883.10322.0.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20121023_092100_987010_9470A1F9) Subject: Re: Cannot bring up second VAP on recent kernels? From: Johannes Berg To: Ben Greear Cc: Felix Fietkau , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:21:23 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5085D66C.3060307@candelatech.com> (sfid-20121023_012747_100309_DEBCD1EF) References: <5085AA78.1080809@candelatech.com> <5085B866.8060306@openwrt.org> <5085BA0E.6080903@candelatech.com> <5085BE64.6030802@openwrt.org> <5085CE19.2000505@candelatech.com> <5085D66C.3060307@candelatech.com> (sfid-20121023_012747_100309_DEBCD1EF) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 16:27 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > Well, crap, it looks like it is this commit. No one considered wanting > to run two hostapd processes on one wiphy :( I'm not sure why you'd want to? It'll work just as well with a single process, and *you* were the one who was so concerned about userspace overhead first ;-) You could fall back to monitor mode AP implementation? johannes