Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:44994 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422702Ab2KNMhb (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2012 07:37:31 -0500 Message-ID: <1352896680.9510.28.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20121114_133734_312580_D3517045) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] mac80211: add ap channel switch command/event From: Johannes Berg To: Michal Kazior Cc: Victor Goldenshtein , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "kgiori@qca.qualcomm.com" , "mcgrof@frijolero.org" , "zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com" , "adrian.chadd@gmail.com" , "j@w1.fi" , "coelho@ti.com" , "igalc@ti.com" , "adrian@freebsd.org" , "nbd@nbd.name" , "simon.wunderlich@s2003.tu-chemnitz.de" Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:38:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <50A38C3A.20908@tieto.com> References: <1350226137-13704-1-git-send-email-victorg@ti.com> <1350226137-13704-7-git-send-email-victorg@ti.com> <1350414472.10177.17.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <50842563.4010201@ti.com> <1350910599.10166.4.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <50922AA9.4030509@ti.com> <1352128994.9466.19.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <50A2617B.3060807@ti.com> <1352892233.9510.26.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <50A38C3A.20908@tieto.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 13:19 +0100, Michal Kazior wrote: > > However, then I realised that that still doesn't work -- once initial > > radar detection is done, it needs to continue while the AP is active. If > > the channel context was going to be relinquished, or even just the > > channel changed for a few seconds, it would be unsafe. So as a result, > > the radar detect operation has to somehow be coupled to the start AP > > operation and prohibit channel changes and additional channel contexts > > during the entire operation time. > > Hmm.. cfg80211 doesn't really know about channel contexts. > > The problem I see is that cfg80211 may be in a combination with > `num_different_channels = 1` and mac80211 can have 2 channel contexts > due to channel type incompatibilities. Yes, this is a concern, we need to fix that anyway though, otherwise it may assume that some operations are possible when they really aren't (e.g. starting an HT40+ and HT40- AP on the same channel, which shouldn't be done anyway, but still) > We'd need to tell cfg80211 that multi-interface is not possible when DFS > is active if we want to at least consider single-channel only DFS. Not sure about multi-interface, but multi-channel at least. johannes