Return-path: Received: from mail-qc0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]:54887 "EHLO mail-qc0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751949Ab2KLT0e (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:26:34 -0500 Received: by mail-qc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id o22so3981707qcr.19 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 11:26:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1352746052-1828-1-git-send-email-thomas@cozybit.com> <1352746052-1828-2-git-send-email-thomas@cozybit.com> From: Thomas Pedersen Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 11:26:13 -0800 Message-ID: (sfid-20121112_202638_055644_8B945E6F) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ath9k: RX timestamp is reported at end of frame To: Adrian Chadd Cc: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, mcgrof@qca.qualcomm.com, jouni@qca.qualcomm.com, vthiagar@qca.qualcomm.com, senthilb@qca.qualcomm.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi, > > Is that true for aggregate RX too? I didn't think the FIFO was big > enough to receive the whole aggregate, so I wonder what timestamp > aggregates sub-frames are receiving. >From our captures it looks like the entire aggragate gets the same timestamp (first frame?). Thomas