Return-path: Received: from purkki.adurom.net ([80.68.90.206]:53848 "EHLO purkki.adurom.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755411Ab2KVSla (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:41:30 -0500 From: Kalle Valo To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: "John W. Linville" , qca_vkondrat , Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] wireless: allow Atheros card to not depend on ath.ko References: <1352978222-13866-1-git-send-email-qca_vkondrat@qca.qualcomm.com> <1352978222-13866-3-git-send-email-qca_vkondrat@qca.qualcomm.com> <8206721.qz6ygglX4j@lx-vladimir> <87txsjvwdw.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:08:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Luis R. Rodriguez's message of "Wed, 21 Nov 2012 07:10:44 -0800") Message-ID: <87mwyaw1vj.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> (sfid-20121122_194137_397701_517C83C6) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: "Luis R. Rodriguez" writes: >> > As was discussed, I prepared this patch that address Kconfig issue for the >> > Atheros wifi cards. >> > >> > Any opinions on this? >> >> Looks good to me, but I didn't check that carefully... >> >> Actually I think ath6kl can make use of this as well, it shouldn't >> depend anything from ath.ko. > > Indeed it should. -ECONFUSED :) Do you mean that ath6kl should or should not depend on ath.ko? -- Kalle Valo