Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:54377 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751682Ab2KPUgQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:36:16 -0500 Message-ID: <1353098204.9490.21.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20121116_213631_514198_885B62C5) Subject: Re: removal of sysfs wext extension broke on F16 From: Johannes Berg To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Dave Airlie , John Linville , LKML , Bill Nottingham , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 21:36:44 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1353098137.9490.20.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20121116_213518_404111_CB0441EC) References: <1352795227.9466.8.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20121116_192027_176167_6DFB40B3) <1353098137.9490.20.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20121116_213518_404111_CB0441EC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 21:35 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 10:20 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Johannes Berg > > wrote: > > > > > > Should I revert it and send it in my next pull request? > > > > Please do. Or perhaps we could just add the directory back, without > > the actual entries, if that is sufficient.. > > Yeah, that does seem to be sufficient, I'll queue up the patch below. Err, no, wishful thinking. I need a *little* bit more for sysfs to work. johannes