Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:51971 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751744Ab2LTNkD (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2012 08:40:03 -0500 Message-ID: <1356010819.10029.15.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20121220_144007_637047_E3B86449) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iwl3945: disable 11a support From: Johannes Berg To: Stanislaw Gruszka Cc: "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:40:19 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1356010313-9782-2-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> (sfid-20121220_143208_346303_FEE45543) References: <1356010313-9782-1-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> <1356010313-9782-2-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> (sfid-20121220_143208_346303_FEE45543) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 14:31 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > I don't believe if there still are users using 11a mode. If they are, > they should probably update their network to something that was > designed in current century, but I also left module option for them. Huh? All of VHT etc. is going to use 5 GHz and will be compatible with legacy clients, so having 11a support will allow them to connect to new networks? Or am I midunderstanding what you're doing here? johannes