Return-path: Received: from mail-la0-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:45099 "EHLO mail-la0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755624Ab2LMUd2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:33:28 -0500 Received: by mail-la0-f46.google.com with SMTP id p5so2173876lag.19 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:33:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7DDF37406E10F0438561DBB78326DF390391C15265@SC-VEXCH1.marvell.com> References: <20121123081444.GA6028@markyou.marvell.com> <20121211194249.GT15974@pogo> <50C9F3FA.6000906@gmail.com> <7DDF37406E10F0438561DBB78326DF390391C15265@SC-VEXCH1.marvell.com> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:33:06 -0800 Message-ID: (sfid-20121213_213331_551476_417CAFB8) Subject: Re: ACS and Hostapd To: Yogesh Powar Cc: Jonathan Bither , "j@w1.fi" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "hostap@lists.shmoo.com" , Matt Smith Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Yogesh Powar wrote: > Hi Jouni/Luis, > > It seems that, we have some resources that can be utilized to test this > feature of ACS for hostapd. > > Before we begin on this work of Luis and optimize/enhance it further, would you > like to recommend some immediate changes from the last test results? By my part: The algorithm I wrote was pretty complex and although I did review it with some folks who liked it and it made sense the algorithm can be simplified by taking the input elements and using a multiplier for each one and letting the user configure the multiplier. In other words all the log stuff I did and linearizing it some way was not all that necessary except for mental masturbation. Apart from that its just a matter of testing and proving it works. Luis