Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:40099 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754667Ab2LJKVp (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2012 05:21:45 -0500 Message-ID: <1355134918.9857.9.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20121210_112446_737216_82298E55) Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless-regdb: add regulatory rule for ETSI members on 60gHz band From: Johannes Berg To: Vladimir Kondratiev Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:21:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1573921.0GjqNuABMd@lx-vladimir> (sfid-20121210_104554_770780_B8ABD895) References: <8774585.BvFN3Opv12@lx-vladimir> <1573921.0GjqNuABMd@lx-vladimir> (sfid-20121210_104554_770780_B8ABD895) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 11:45 +0200, Vladimir Kondratiev wrote: > For the 60gHz band, regulation defined in the "Etsi En 302 567" > http://docsfiles.com/pdf_final_draft_etsi_en_302_567.html > +country AD: > + # 60 gHz band channels 1-4, ref: Etsi En 302 567 > + (57240 - 65880 @ 2160), (N/A, 40), NO-OUTDOOR > + (57240 - 65880 @ 2160), (N/A, 25) There doesn't seem to be a bandwidth limitation in the rules, should we really put one into the database? johannes