Return-path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:59715 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751727Ab2LTM61 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:58:27 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tlfhp-0002li-6R for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:58:33 +0100 Received: from aslw039181.ethz.ch ([129.132.39.181]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:58:33 +0100 Received: from dantard by aslw039181.ethz.ch with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:58:33 +0100 To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org From: Danilo Subject: Re: Incoherency in iw (or mac80211 or drivers) behavior -- possible BUG in iwl4965 Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: (sfid-20121220_135830_604602_407381DF) References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Gábor Stefanik writes: > > IIRC iwl4965 uses its own rate control algorithm (a while ago, it was > called "iwl-agn-rs", before the iwlegacy split). I think you should > look for the problem there. > Thanks for the answer. In fact I looked at it as well and I tried to force iwl4965 to use 'minstrel' or 'pid' algorithm hacking the code of the mac80211 with scarce success. Do you know what is the correct way of selecting the desire rate control algorithm? Thanks again.