Return-path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:52609 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964810Ab2LEUxP (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2012 15:53:15 -0500 Message-ID: <1354740752.6234.85.camel@cumari.coelho.fi> (sfid-20121205_215325_998852_BC8E3E7D) Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/20] wlcore: disable elp sleep while in plt mode From: Luciano Coelho To: Arik Nemtsov CC: , Yair Shapira Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 22:52:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1354095769-8724-10-git-send-email-arik@wizery.com> References: <1354095769-8724-1-git-send-email-arik@wizery.com> <1354095769-8724-10-git-send-email-arik@wizery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 11:42 +0200, Arik Nemtsov wrote: > From: Yair Shapira > > We now disable elp sleep during plt mode to allow normal operation of > plt tools such as calibrator. > > Having elp_sleep enabled during plt mode is actually not required and > in fact it disrupt plt operations such as rx statistics etc... Has this really been observed in practice? At least what I remember is that we use CAM power mode in PLT (during init) so we never get to ELP mode. > This is based on wl12xx (R5) commit 5cf0fe31ab This is residue from internal code and is meaningless in the mainline. -- Luca.