Return-path: Received: from sabertooth02.qualcomm.com ([65.197.215.38]:3435 "EHLO sabertooth02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751045Ab3AMHd6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jan 2013 02:33:58 -0500 From: Vladimir Kondratiev To: Kalle Valo CC: Subject: Re: Q: how to update platform power state for the network driver Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 09:33:54 +0200 Message-ID: <1550342.hytzsOV4KI@lx-vladimir> (sfid-20130113_083410_553786_121E7FB3) In-Reply-To: <87ehhsu38q.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> References: <6929081.7c7blFVDp4@lx-vladimir> <87ehhsu38q.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thursday, January 10, 2013 11:39:33 PM Kalle Valo wrote: > Vladimir Kondratiev writes: > > > in 60g spec (802.11ad, references to this doc.), station should set "power source" bit in the: [skip] > > Scary! Just of curiosity, how is this bit supposed to be used in real life? > In 60g, you have new ah-hoc network type, PBSS, that should be used for P2P (spec mandates it) In PBSS, there is AP-like entity called PCP. Instead of P2P GO negotiation, GO choosen before, on lower layer, when selecting PCP. In this decision, "best suitable" candidate selected PCP, based on "PCP factor" calculated for each peer. Most significant bit there is "power" since one who is AC powered is better candidate. Bottom line - this is to elect as P2P GO AC-powered one (if there is such peer). Thanks, Vladimir