Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:46043 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754563Ab3AKVaQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:30:16 -0500 Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:26:59 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: Xose Vazquez Perez Cc: linux-wireless , wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: wireless-regdb updated, please check! Message-ID: <20130111212659.GH2170@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20130111_223024_982013_EE65B1B5) References: <50F07C03.3050204@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <50F07C03.3050204@gmail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:54:27PM +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > John W. Linville wrote: > > > I've been sitting on some wireless-regdb patches for some time. > > Mostly this is because I wasn't sure what to do with some/most of them. > > I even still have a few more like that... > > > > Anyway, I wanted to at least get the 60GHz bits out, and I pushed a > > few other changes as well. Please take a look, and let me know if > > I merged anything wrong or if there is still something missing. > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-regdb.git > > > Did you forget CC:wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org ? Well, sorta...but I'm not sure that you can prove that anyone actually reads that list anyway... :-( > How about these? > > CEPT rules to ES: > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-July/000073.html > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-July/000074.html > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-July/000075.html Yeah, those are probably fine. I'll try to pick those up in a few days... John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.