Return-path: Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:52443 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751734Ab3AaPse (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:48:34 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:48:22 -0600 From: Seth Forshee To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" , Arend van Spriel , Stanislaw Gruszka Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Improvements to software scanning Message-ID: <20130131154822.GA28799@thinkpad-t410> (sfid-20130131_164837_427311_8958CC80) References: <1359503255-18270-1-git-send-email-seth.forshee@canonical.com> <1359644664.8415.68.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1359644664.8415.68.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 04:04:24PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > Second, I attempted to test these patches with iwlwifi (Centrino > > Advanced-N 6235) to verify that I didn't break anything for drivers with > > hw scanning. My standard test for this involves running iperf while > > triggering nearly continuous scans, but I'm seeing lots of problems > > running a tcp iperf test even with unpatched 3.8-rc4. iperf with udp > > does fine in either direction. I haven't had time to do any kind of > > debugging yet, but I thought you'd want to know. > > Hm, ok, thanks. I just tried moving this card to a different slot in the same machine, and it's working fine. Hardware problem I guess. Sorry for the false alarm. Seth