Return-path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:43349 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932146Ab3AIQGL (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2013 11:06:11 -0500 Message-ID: <50ED94F7.9000709@ti.com> (sfid-20130109_170620_417110_38C1C5DF) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 18:04:07 +0200 From: Victor Goldenshtein MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johannes Berg CC: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: fix delayed ADDBA response References: <1357654597-8493-1-git-send-email-victorg@ti.com> <1357735100.9757.9.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> In-Reply-To: <1357735100.9757.9.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/01/13 14:38, Johannes Berg wrote: > Do we really want to allow arbitrary changes to the interfaces while > scanning? This could process a deauth frame for example, I'm worried > that might break things. > Can you please elaborate why we shouldn't process deauth frames during HW scan ? This fix was tested with our 18xx, don't see how it can break things, but it's up to you whether to take it.. -- Thanks, Victor.