Message-ID: <50F4469F.3030407@broadcom.com> (sfid-20130114_185654_099830_2F772112)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:55:43 +0100
From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Xose Vazquez Perez" <xose.vazquez@gmail.com>
cc: wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [wireless-regdb] wireless-regdb updated, please check!
References: <50F07C03.3050204@gmail.com>
 <20130111212659.GH2170@tuxdriver.com> <50F2B912.3060902@gmail.com>
 <50F2C154.2040807@broadcom.com> <50F3D145.7060004@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <50F3D145.7060004@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=iso-8859-1
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

On 01/14/2013 10:35 AM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> On 01/13/2013 03:14 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> 
>> On 01/13/2013 02:39 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> 
>>> On 01/11/2013 10:26 PM, John W. Linville wrote:
> 
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:54:27PM +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>>>>>>> Did you forget CC:wireless-regdb at lists.infradead.org ?
> 
>>>>> Well, sorta...but I'm not sure that you can prove that anyone actually
>>>>> reads that list anyway... :-(
>>> 40 people:
> 
>> I would put my money on it that most of those are also keeping taps on
>> the linux-wireless list. I know I do.
> 
> If people believe wireless-regdb ml is superfluous, should it be
> removed ?

Not entirely what I said, but maybe John implied it. The added value of
it would be that regulatory patches are archived separately. I can see
that announcements are a gray area as you may want to reach a bigger crowd.

Gr. AvS