Return-path: Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:4895 "EHLO c60.cesmail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757441Ab3ANWgx (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:36:53 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:27:03 -0500 From: Pavel Roskin To: Xose Vazquez Perez Cc: linux-wireless Subject: Re: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org dead ?? Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Delay) Message-ID: <20130114172703.12de8ed2@mj> (sfid-20130114_233658_106795_644C22C3) In-Reply-To: <50F42EAC.40005@gmail.com> References: <047d7b621b90b55bd304d341d180@google.com> <50F42EAC.40005@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:13:32 +0100 Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > hi, > > is ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org alive ? It's dead most of the time. There have been DNS problems with ath5k.org and ath9k.org for months. Sometimes the DNS records are valid, but most of the time, they are not. I informed Michael Renzmann about it. He is the one who "maintains" the lists. He is also the maintainer of MadWifi. He replied to me that he knows about the problem. I think we should remove ath5k and ath9k lists from the MAINTAINERS file. I believe most questions about ath5k and ath9k can be discussed in linux-wireless. Maybe a new list could be created to discuss all Atheros hardware on Linux. It could be used to make sure that Atheros/Qualcomm engineers are aware of the topic. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin