Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:43543 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752759Ab3AUPs0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:48:26 -0500 Message-ID: <1358783326.5190.5.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20130121_164829_870572_783031E8) Subject: Re: Intel Wifi 6200 N iwlwifi (Unsupported (too old) EEPROM VER=0x416 < 0x423 CALIB=0x5 < 0x4) From: Johannes Berg To: Paul Freeman Cc: "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 16:48:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8785d94b44b4a14f3a24a78eb9c53507@noc4.net> (sfid-20130121_154221_263182_CDB4D94B) References: <10f63cd798eeb6fa6168f6342af3c373@noc4.net> <20130121142750.GA2212@tuxdriver.com> <8785d94b44b4a14f3a24a78eb9c53507@noc4.net> (sfid-20130121_154221_263182_CDB4D94B) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 14:43 +0000, Paul Freeman wrote: > On 2013-01-21 14:27, John W. Linville wrote: > > The last time we saw something like that, the Intel folks said it was > > a device that was not supposed to have been released to the wild...? > > > > Hmm, as in Engineering Sample/Pre-Release? ... if anyone has any > confirmation on that it would be handy - then I can return the card from > whence it came! Typically that's exactly the case. Can you send me (privately if you wish) pictures of both sides of the card? johannes