Return-path: Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com ([209.85.212.54]:44598 "EHLO mail-vb0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756262Ab3APXFH (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:05:07 -0500 Received: by mail-vb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l1so1902065vba.13 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:05:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1358248982.4648.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:05:05 -0800 Message-ID: (sfid-20130117_000512_688423_1DB51540) Subject: Re: Tx AMSDU Support From: Adrian Chadd To: Krishna Chaitanya Cc: Johannes Berg , linux-wireless , nbd@openwrt.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: .. for testing that out, I ended up just using a NIC that implements AMSDU in software. God knows what it was though (intel?).. Yes it would be nice to implement A-MSDU TX in software. But I agree with Felix - there's a lot of logic that can be shared with the A-MPDU aggregation code.. Adrian