Return-path: Received: from mx2.compro.net ([12.186.155.4]:8640 "EHLO mx2.compro.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752853Ab3ACMwr (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jan 2013 07:52:47 -0500 Message-ID: <50E57F1D.7050803@compro.net> (sfid-20130103_135256_654381_47F07D16) Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 07:52:45 -0500 From: Mark Hounschell Reply-To: markh@compro.net MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org CC: markh@compro.net, Larry Finger , Johannes Berg , dmarkh@cfl.rr.com Subject: Re: rtl8192cu problem - Re: Wireless network problem with Access Point selection using ifup References: <50C0A743.3000305@compro.net> (sfid-20121206_152423_356618_ADE5D3BC) <1354806200.18211.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <50C1C103.1000803@cfl.rr.com> <50C256A9.7010008@compro.net> <1354913688.9124.2.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <50C25A4B.8030302@compro.net> <50C5B65F.4040104@cfl.rr.com> <1355135199.9857.11.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <50C5C321.1090501@cfl.rr.com> <1355138959.9857.13.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <50C5CEF4.1070907@cfl.rr.com> <1355143613.9857.20.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <50C60CAB.4080400@lwfinger.net> <50C61E16.3010404@compro.net> In-Reply-To: <50C61E16.3010404@compro.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/10/2012 12:38 PM, Mark Hounschell wrote: > On 12/10/2012 11:24 AM, Larry Finger wrote: >> On 12/10/2012 06:46 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: >>> On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 07:00 -0500, Mark Hounschell wrote: >>> >>>> Should I file and bug report and/or contact the author? >>> >>> Larry, the issue seems to be that rtl8192cu doesn't scan after having >>> disconnected at least once, and maybe doesn't report any/good signal >>> strength values. >> >> The problem is likely that rtl8192cu goes mute after a disconnect. I'm >> not sure if it happens only with WPA/WPA2 or if all encryption methods >> are affected. I have not yet found the problem, but this and other >> reports have increased the priority. >> > > FYI, > > If you look at the logs for the instance when the furthest away AP was > selected (info-furthest-away), At least I, see no disconnections at all. > It selected the furthest AP yet was unusable. Yet no disconnects and > iwconfig showed good. > I haven't noticed any activity on this. Should I just toss out all my rtl8192cu devices? If so, can anyone recommend ANY USB wireless-N devices that actually work as they should in Linux with Linux drivers? Thanks and Regards Mark