Return-path: Received: from purkki.adurom.net ([80.68.90.206]:50674 "EHLO purkki.adurom.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933044Ab3BLN0q (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2013 08:26:46 -0500 From: Kalle Valo To: Dan Williams Cc: linux-wireless Subject: Re: brcmsmac and IBSS References: <1360604039.1559.44.camel@dcbw.foobar.com> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:26:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1360604039.1559.44.camel@dcbw.foobar.com> (Dan Williams's message of "Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:33:59 -0600") Message-ID: <87zjz9aciy.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> (sfid-20130212_142648_807110_8532E809) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Dan Williams writes: > Had a bug report that a 4313 doesn't support IBSS mode, and dug around > and found out that brcmsmac only supports STA mode. Is that really true > and there's no IBSS support in the smac driver? Is that a firmware or > driver limitation? Seems odd that this got missed during the merge > reviews as IBSS is pretty basic functionality that all the kernel wifi > drivers have had for 5 or 7 years. Are you saying that we should require Ad-Hoc mode from all drivers? I hope not, I consider it as a niche feature. It also has it's own problems, power save and encryption at least come to my mind. -- Kalle Valo