Return-path: Received: from vms173001pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.1]:57237 "EHLO vms173001pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757434Ab3BXPGT (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Feb 2013 10:06:19 -0500 Received: from odin.tremily.us ([unknown] [72.68.84.219]) by vms173001.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0MIQ001BNCMGEM60@vms173001.mailsrvcs.net> for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 09:06:17 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 10:06:15 -0500 From: "W. Trevor King" To: Hauke Mehrtens Cc: arend@broadcom.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list@broadcom.com Subject: Re: [RFC 12/13] brcmsmac: add support for probe response template Message-id: <20130224150615.GN1361@odin.tremily.us> (sfid-20130224_160624_446400_0BD9937E) References: <1361667972-22909-1-git-send-email-hauke@hauke-m.de> <1361667972-22909-13-git-send-email-hauke@hauke-m.de> <20130224023008.GG1361@odin.tremily.us> <5129DFCD.3020009@hauke-m.de> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=gWRamliw218YCZO9 In-reply-to: <5129DFCD.3020009@hauke-m.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --gWRamliw218YCZO9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:39:25AM +0100, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > On 02/24/2013 03:30 AM, W. Trevor King wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 02:06:10AM +0100, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > >> The ucode is able to answer probe response by itself. This writes > >> such a template into the specific memory. Currently the probe > >> requests are also send to mac80211 so there are more answers send > >> to a requesting client. We have to make the ucode stop sending > >> probe requests to the driver. > >=20 > > Should this read "so there are more answers sent to"? > >=20 > yes there are more answers then normal send out, but it is normal that > you send out more than one, at least I have seen it so it is probably > in the standard. The last part of this patch could applied again to > not receive probe requests any more: I was just trying to correct the English ;), not make a deeper statement about the content. Sorry for my initial ambiguity=E2=80=A6 --=20 This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy --gWRamliw218YCZO9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRKixnAAoJEEUbTsx0l5OMjY0P/0tjlq6jWe5TBJdG2YVDRr2r b88bWqtGfImxnuLVP/nz/6fTellzJz9BsfJzbT5qT6cBPneeqEc53W+t/LT9Tl26 r/MnV7vKYKjfrW930Uk7wkX+sjOsqG29VqJmgOhFU3S6Wz4urzHLQa0i9OKZceFA /9smp83Ir1uQW9r7JYO3iwDAhrZnGTrqjVsqoVgPgkONApLuaOFA03TdSOYguW3j P4VOX28IcjOguqKBi5OTEacPBzOFSuhganfKzsT9UfImNVsRz5CegssrI44olQio 174t676uuCqjwldZzHuq+p71QyqVyyiaIV4vodEAygYWCyQcU9Hjg5A8VEtp+vmB sIq6zkOp5biIrwOpFf0mzxsYNBcpehZiUMNw1hLQ492GSzGc6ZLwGPT3Ueh/UTvE AazkKj6nIWxk46zhIleZUNGPcP8kkRjUkZ5aYtT5M+5mgAJUOaiMmX4PewTxwk5C 3yJk51ln9jIdzmhXQ11B9wR8wgQJ2CvTEo4e1gVD2Cc4PlQydWc3uWalIRa/Lp8v 4IxAdjwUsk7bkosW9kczCKwtm3wmboSW++wI2YGqYY1KeSfxIMYGNrp/cmwALuHZ QCUhWJCUdSKRdNWbXLzDjASZXnOv/Yy1NiZvNGW8SkH1n1lNzRIqrlWKpGlDbMD3 znCaG4zLzwJYuaIeqi0Z =CiBy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gWRamliw218YCZO9--