Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:51582 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750964Ab3BTRAp (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:00:45 -0500 Message-ID: <1361379597.8629.39.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20130220_180054_444131_D4C10143) Subject: Re: 3.7.8/amd64 full interrupt hangs due to iwlwifi under big nfs copies out From: Johannes Berg To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Marc MERLIN , David Miller , Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net, bhutchings@solarflare.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:59:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1361379331.19353.189.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (sfid-20130220_175537_373410_F2F98F44) References: <1333998672.3007.245.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20120409.153452.1284163346306246866.davem@davemloft.net> <1334030180.13293.98.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20120410051127.GA32048@merlins.org> <1334038263.2907.1.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20120411052733.GA17352@merlins.org> <20120715215935.GF24420@merlins.org> <1342419529.3265.12217.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20120716151826.GA10586@merlins.org> <1342455717.2830.14.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130219040557.GB4778@merlins.org> <1361251033.19353.120.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (sfid-20130219_061917_530878_1ED7A14C) <1361268221.8553.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <1361290909.19353.140.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (sfid-20130219_172155_748777_C3ED0F5E) <1361351538.8629.3.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20130220_101252_930264_DBD3955C) <1361351703.8629.5.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <1361373064.19353.180.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (sfid-20130220_161110_395796_DBAC0744) <1361377243.8629.34.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <1361379331.19353.189.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (sfid-20130220_175537_373410_F2F98F44) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 08:55 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > It will make a huge difference, even on non pressure mode, as TCP > > > receive window will grow twice faster. > > > > Hmm, why does that depend on the allocation size? > > I guess you missed all the patches about skb->truesize on netdev Yeah, I don't follow netdev much any more... > > > - skb = alloc_skb(128, GFP_ATOMIC); > > > + fraglen = 128; > > > + /* if we use order-1 pages, copy to get better TCP performance */ > > > + if (rxb->truesize > PAGE_SIZE) > > > + fraglen = max_t(unsigned, fraglen, len); > > > + > > > + skb = alloc_skb(fraglen, GFP_ATOMIC); > > > > Hmm, I don't quite understand -- that's not doing any copy? > > > > FWIW if you do the copy you should not "steal" the pages, then they'd be > > recycled in the RX ring right away. > > Code should just works, please read the following lines in the same > function.... > > /* If frame is small enough to fit in skb->head, pull it completely. > * If not, only pull ieee80211_hdr so that splice() or TCP coalesce > * are more efficient. > */ Oh, right, though I guess the comment is now wrong since practically every packet will be copied either here or in mac80211 (A-MSDUs are split up there) johannes