Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:56140 "EHLO ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753138Ab3BUUqv (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:46:51 -0500 Message-ID: <512687B5.5050208@candelatech.com> (sfid-20130221_214656_571536_F76B0ECD) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:46:45 -0800 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johannes Berg CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] VHT capability override References: <1361473906-14941-1-git-send-email-johannes@sipsolutions.net> <5126797F.4030300@candelatech.com> <1361479008.8327.3.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> In-Reply-To: <1361479008.8327.3.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/21/2013 12:36 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 11:46 -0800, Ben Greear wrote: >> On 02/21/2013 11:11 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: >>> I got a request to support this for testing. Anyone need other >>> parameters? The multi-bit fields are a bit tricky so I didn't >>> implement all of them yet. >> >> I haven't managed to acquire any VHT hardware yet (or look at features >> in detail yet), but the option set looks good to me. > > How would you do the wpa_s code? *Could* use lots of boolean options like I did last time for HT, but perhaps something like vht_caps=0xdead would be better (ie, all flags in one argument) to cut down on the amount of code needed... Maybe Jouni is the one to ask... Thanks, Ben > > johannes > -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com