Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:50577 "EHLO mail-wg0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754000Ab3BGO51 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2013 09:57:27 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id dr13so2126467wgb.14 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 06:57:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1360246653.8038.9.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> References: <7384f4ddc838247a0f467708d66baa8c@posedge.com> <1360225230.8038.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <1360228991.8038.3.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <5113B42A.4020708@openwrt.org> <1360246653.8038.9.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> From: Krishna Chaitanya Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 06:57:05 -0800 Message-ID: (sfid-20130207_155730_827163_D9FDB1A1) Subject: Re: [RFC] mac80211: Add support for Tx-AMSDU viz debugfs. To: Johannes Berg Cc: Felix Fietkau , chaitanyatk@posedge.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, maheshp@posedge.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 15:03 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote: > >> > But the problem is every time we have to test the Rx-AMSDU >> > which is mandatory for WFA 802.11n cert, we need to procure a adapter >> > which supports it, which is difficult. Thats the scenario we have faced >> > which lead us to work on this.With this feature in place we can use >> > any opensource adapter and driver for that purpose. >> > >> > Again, Its a trade off between stability and usability :-) >> How about injecting A-MSDU packets via cooked monitor mode or nl80211 >> frame tx and thus shifting the debug-only code into userspace? > > nl80211 won't work -- no support for data frames (and I'd rather not add > it), but monitor mode (why cooked?) seems fine. But whats the use of sending an AMSDU if we are not connected? First check in the code is to check for a connection.